"The combination of AT&T [and] DirectTV's vast distribution infrastructure, and Time Warner's extremely popular television programming would be one of the largest mergers in American history", the official added.
The Justice Department official also warned that such a merger could allow AT&T to slow down advances in technology that would cut costs for consumers.
AT&T responded in a statement, calling the lawsuit "a radical and inexplicable departure from decades of antitrust precedent".
New Caledonia quake no threat to NZ
The Pacific Tsunami Warning Centre said hazardous tsunami waves were possible along the coastlines of New Caledonia and Vanuatu. Preliminary reports say the quake registered as a 7.3, but officials have since lowered the strength to a 7.0 magnitude.
'Justice League's Rotten Tomatoes Score Has Finally Been Released
Generally, the closer the reviews are published to the movie's release date, the lower the score, according to a Mashable report. For many DC movie fans, Rotten Tomatoes scores have been a particular source of fascination and criticism.
RT Network Now Official Russian 'Agent' in the US
If such company also gets its funding from foreign sources, the Ministry of Justice would be able to declare it a foreign agent . They will also face a similar responsibility for such NGOs for breaching this legislation.
Earlier this month, reports suggested that the DOJ was pushing AT&T to sell off either DirecTV or Turner Broadcasting, which houses CNN, in order to get the green light for the merger.
By testing the arrangement, the Justice Department is adopting a starkly unique strategy to antitrust issues than the Obama organization did.
AT&T's rocky quest to complete its acquisition of Time Warner just hit another speed bump. "This deal would give AT&T way too much power to undercut competitors and raise costs on TV viewers and internet users everywhere".
As NPR's David Folkenflik has reported, the DOJ's anticipated lawsuit had "triggered concerns" within CNN that the Trump administration was "taking action against a media outfit simply because it has angered the president with its coverage, raising First Amendment implications". "We are confident that the court will reject the government's claims and permit this merger under longstanding legal precedent".